LTE max MIMO Rx #4

New Issue

2025-07-25T06:48:00+02:00

rtommy commented

2025-07-25 06:48:00 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Similar to NR max MIMO Rx, should LTE max MIMO Rx also have EN-DC considered?

Now these 2 features are not aligned, it seems.

addSupportRow(hasLteCaData, maxLteMimo > 0, `${maxLteMimo} Rx`, "No LTE MIMO support found", "LTE max MIMO Rx", "Log misses LTE-CA capabilities.", true);
addSupportRow(hasEndc || hasNrca, maxNrMimo > 0, `${maxNrMimo} Rx`, "No NR MIMO support found", "NR max MIMO Rx", "Log misses EN-DC and NR-CA capabilities.", true);

Similar to `NR max MIMO Rx`, should `LTE max MIMO Rx` also have EN-DC considered? Now these 2 features are not aligned, it seems. ```js addSupportRow(hasLteCaData, maxLteMimo > 0, `${maxLteMimo} Rx`, "No LTE MIMO support found", "LTE max MIMO Rx", "Log misses LTE-CA capabilities.", true); addSupportRow(hasEndc || hasNrca, maxNrMimo > 0, `${maxNrMimo} Rx`, "No NR MIMO support found", "NR max MIMO Rx", "Log misses EN-DC and NR-CA capabilities.", true); ```

high3eam commented

2025-07-28 09:59:55 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Fixed in 6a69ccb
Thank you!

Fixed in 6a69ccb Thank you!

rtommy commented

2025-07-28 10:02:49 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Should be Log misses LTE-CA and EN-DC capabilities. or Log misses EN-DC and LTE-CA capabilities. ?
Just to make sure it's the same everywhere.

Should be `Log misses LTE-CA and EN-DC capabilities.` or `Log misses EN-DC and LTE-CA capabilities.` ? Just to make sure it's the same everywhere.

high3eam commented

2025-07-28 11:19:49 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@rtommy
415cb8f

@rtommy 415cb8f

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: henrik/uecapabilityparser-features-js#4